Barnes Spitfire Bullets

Talk about your 450b reloading experience, ask questions, etc...

Moderator: MudBug

Forum rules
Please try and keep it safe!

This information is the responsibility of the community, not the forum. 450bushmaster.net is not responsible if you blow yourselves up.

Barnes Spitfire Bullets

Postby Wicked Hunter » Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:45 pm

I've been playing around with the solid copper Barnes Muzzleloader bullets lately, and was looking for some that didnt come with the sabot. I figured it would be a little cheaper and I wouldnt have to throw the sabots away. I found on there site where you can buy the 250gr and 290gr Spitfire T-EZ's without the sabots.
http://barnesbullets.myshopify.com/collections/spit-fire-t-eztm. Doesnt look like much of a cost savings though. It works out to be $1.25 ea. for the 250gr. Buying them with the sabot in a package of 15 they cost $1.33. I figured there would be a bigger price difference, especially since there saving on packaging. Still wanting to try the TMZ's as they are boat tailed. Will keep you up to date on what i figure out.
User avatar
Wicked Hunter
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:18 pm
Location: Waterloo, Indiana

Re: Barnes Spitfire Bullets

Postby Wicked Hunter » Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:40 am

I bought me some 250gr Barnes TMZ's last week and had a chance to shoot them this weekend. They are basically the same bullet as the TEZ but with a boat-tail. I thought the boat tail might tighten things up a bit as it usually does with the other calibers i shoot, and boy was i wrong! The best group i got was 4" using 38gr of lil-gun. So i guess i'll stick to the TEZ bullet. I've also got some 275gr XPB's on the way. We'll see how it goes with them.
User avatar
Wicked Hunter
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:18 pm
Location: Waterloo, Indiana

Re: Barnes Spitfire Bullets

Postby Hoot » Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:50 am

Wicked Hunter wrote:I bought me some 250gr Barnes TMZ's last week and had a chance to shoot them this weekend. They are basically the same bullet as the TEZ but with a boat-tail. I thought the boat tail might tighten things up a bit as it usually does with the other calibers i shoot, and boy was i wrong! The best group i got was 4" using 38gr of lil-gun. So i guess i'll stick to the TEZ bullet. I've also got some 275gr XPB's on the way. We'll see how it goes with them.


You'll love the 275 XPBs. IMHO, the boat tail won't buy you much at the ranges we typically shoot the 450B. Flat base bullets tend to rule in this caliber. Not sure why the TMZ uses a boat tail other than eye appeal.

Hoot
In Theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In Practice, there is.
User avatar
Hoot
 
Posts: 5085
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:34 am
Location: Minnesota

Re: Barnes Spitfire Bullets

Postby Wicked Hunter » Mon Mar 19, 2012 2:42 pm

Barnes boasts the boat-tail for better long range perfomance. They started with the TMZ and then came out with the TEZ, as guys were having poor accuracy and hard loading with the TMZ. I guess you dont know till you try.
User avatar
Wicked Hunter
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:18 pm
Location: Waterloo, Indiana

Re: Barnes Spitfire Bullets

Postby paulmark3010 » Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:03 pm

Hoot wrote:
Wicked Hunter wrote:I bought me some 250gr Barnes TMZ's last week and had a chance to shoot them this weekend. They are basically the same bullet as the TEZ but with a boat-tail. I thought the boat tail might tighten things up a bit as it usually does with the other calibers i shoot, and boy was i wrong! The best group i got was 4" using 38gr of lil-gun. So i guess i'll stick to the TEZ bullet. I've also got some 275gr XPB's on the way. We'll see how it goes with them.


You'll love the 275 XPBs. IMHO, the boat tail won't buy you much at the ranges we typically shoot the 450B. Flat base bullets tend to rule in this caliber. Not sure why the TMZ uses a boat tail other than eye appeal.

Hoot


You ever try the 200 XPBs? :twisted:
paulmark3010
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:46 pm
Location: Spring, Texas

Re: Barnes Spitfire Bullets

Postby Hoot » Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:21 am

paulmark3010 wrote:You ever try the 200 XPBs? :twisted:


"Child, you cut me to the quick. I'm an old Kansas man myself..." ;)

XPB Part 1

XPB Part 2

XPB Part 3

XPB Water Shots

Hoot
In Theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In Practice, there is.
User avatar
Hoot
 
Posts: 5085
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:34 am
Location: Minnesota

Re: Barnes Spitfire Bullets

Postby Wicked Hunter » Wed Mar 21, 2012 7:52 am

I would try them but i feel i'd be wasting money. I'm shooting a Trident Upper with a 16twist barrel and i'm quikly noticing the heavier the bullet the better the groups. That's the main reason i'm playing with the solid copper bullets. I can shoot a lighter bullet but still have it stabilize since the solid coppers are longer than lead bullets of the same weight. I haven't ruled any of the light bullets out yet, i'm just on a 250-300 grain kick at the moment.
User avatar
Wicked Hunter
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:18 pm
Location: Waterloo, Indiana

Re: Barnes Spitfire Bullets

Postby Hoot » Wed Mar 21, 2012 10:59 am

Wicked Hunter wrote:I would try them but i feel i'd be wasting money. I'm shooting a Trident Upper with a 16twist barrel and i'm quikly noticing the heavier the bullet the better the groups. That's the main reason i'm playing with the solid copper bullets. I can shoot a lighter bullet but still have it stabilize since the solid coppers are longer than lead bullets of the same weight. I haven't ruled any of the light bullets out yet, i'm just on a 250-300 grain kick at the moment.


This affords an excellent opportunity to bring up the problem of sharing data across different platforms. Not that the difference is as significant as trying to share the load info from a bolt action to an autoloader, but the different twist rates between factory and Trident barrels will contribute some differences in behavior. We can all relate to the longer bullets stability issue, but some folks do not realize that the harder a barrel tries (and succeeds) in spinning a bullet faster, the greater the resistance to the bullet traveling down the barrel. In a faster twist barrel, to maintain the same velocity as a slower twist, you will need to apply more pressure or reduce the velocity to keep the pressure the same.

So, those of you sporting the Trident barrels will have an opportunity to contribute a second set of data points to the existing ones already developed for the factory barrels running a slower twist. Once we begin to build up a second database, it should be interesting, comparing the differences and similarities between the two.

Some day, we will hopefully have a process in place that will facilitate contributing to a central load repository for all the well documented work that has been done already and spread across hell and a half acre in this forum. A place where new members can view what has been documented and either benefit from that work or avoid duplicating the effort at a cost of time and money.
Image

Hoot
In Theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In Practice, there is.
User avatar
Hoot
 
Posts: 5085
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:34 am
Location: Minnesota

Re: Barnes Spitfire Bullets

Postby wildcatter » Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:24 pm

Hoot wrote:
Wicked Hunter wrote:I would try them but i feel i'd be wasting money. I'm shooting a Trident Upper with a 16twist barrel and i'm quikly noticing the heavier the bullet the better the groups. That's the main reason i'm playing with the solid copper bullets. I can shoot a lighter bullet but still have it stabilize since the solid coppers are longer than lead bullets of the same weight. I haven't ruled any of the light bullets out yet, i'm just on a 250-300 grain kick at the moment.


This affords an excellent opportunity to bring up the problem of sharing data across different platforms. Not that the difference is as significant as trying to share the load info from a bolt action to an autoloader, but the different twist rates between factory and Trident barrels will contribute some differences in behavior. We can all relate to the longer bullets stability issue, but some folks do not realize that the harder a barrel tries (and succeeds) in spinning a bullet faster, the greater the resistance to the bullet traveling down the barrel. In a faster twist barrel, to maintain the same velocity as a slower twist, you will need to apply more pressure or reduce the velocity to keep the pressure the same.

So, those of you sporting the Trident barrels will have an opportunity to contribute a second set of data points to the existing ones already developed for the factory barrels running a slower twist. Once we begin to build up a second database, it should be interesting, comparing the differences and similarities between the two.

Some day, we will hopefully have a process in place that will facilitate contributing to a central load repository for all the well documented work that has been done already and spread across hell and a half acre in this forum. A place where new members can view what has been documented and either benefit from that work or avoid duplicating the effort at a cost of time and money.
Image

Hoot


Here, Here!!!..

..t
Safety First..t
User avatar
wildcatter
 
Posts: 2914
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 8:30 pm
Location: In the Middle of Deer Central Station or better known as, in the Thumb of Beautiful Michigan

Re: Barnes Spitfire Bullets

Postby bushmeister » Wed Mar 21, 2012 10:15 pm

I feel bad for that horse. :lol:
User avatar
bushmeister
 
Posts: 694
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 2:10 pm
Location: Georgia


Return to Reloading for the 450b

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 92 guests